Astro Support Squid

With so many CMS options available, choosing the right one for your Astro project can be challenging. After gathering insights from the community, here’s a breakdown of the most mentioned CMS solutions, their strengths, weaknesses, and user opinions.

Git-Based CMSs

These CMSs store content in a Git repository and trigger site rebuilds upon content changes.

DecapCMS (formerly Netlify CMS)

• Pros: Easy to set up, free, Git-based, editorial workflow support, integrates well with Netlify.

• Cons: Vendor lock-in with Netlify for authentication, poor mobile UI, limited live preview capabilities.

• User Opinions:

  • "DecapCMS works well, but I don’t like the authentication dependency on Netlify."

  • "I chose DecapCMS for its editorial workflow and ease of use."

TinaCMS

• Pros: Git-based, integrates with Vercel, free cloud-based editor, live preview.

• Cons: Paid plan required for editorial workflow, React-based, some issues with sorting.

• User Opinions:

  • "TinaCMS is easy to set up, but image handling can be tricky."

  • "Self-hosting TinaCMS was difficult."

Keystatic

• Pros: Git-based, good integration with Astro content collections, self-hostable.

• Cons: Requires GitHub authentication, lacks live preview.

• User Opinions:

  • "Great for Astro but missing live preview."

  • "Managing media in Keystatic is a hassle unless you pay."

SveltiaCMS

• Pros: Built with Svelte, extends DecapCMS, additional features like DeepL translation.

• Cons: Editor is still being improved, lacks MDX support.

• User Opinions:

  • "Looks promising, excited to try it."

Darkmatter

• Pros: Native app for Astro content collections, developer-friendly.

• Cons: Mac-only, requires Git knowledge, lacks a web version (in development).

• User Opinions:

  • "Cool idea, but difficult for non-technical clients."

GitCMS

• Pros: Git-based, lightweight, integrates directly with Git repositories.

• Cons: Still very new, limited free plan, fewer integrations.

• User Opinions:

  • "A simple, straightforward Git-based CMS option."

FrontMatter

• Pros: VS Code extension for managing Markdown-based content, integrates with Git.

• Cons: Requires VS Code, limited to file-based workflows.

• User Opinions:

  • "Perfect for developers who want a local CMS experience."

API-Based / Headless CMSs

These CMSs provide an API for fetching content dynamically.

Sanity

• Pros: Free tier (250k API requests/month), powerful querying (GROQ), webhook support.

• Cons: Requires React for full use, some complexity in setup.

• User Opinions:

  • "Great if you don’t mind React; free tier is generous."

  • "Sanity’s GROQ queries take some getting used to."

Storyblok

• Pros: Powerful visual editor, structured content, API-based.

• Cons: Overkill for simple blogs.

• User Opinions:

  • "Too much for just CRUD blog posts."

Squidex

• Pros: Open-source, API-first, real-time collaboration features.

• Cons: Requires hosting, slightly complex setup.

• User Opinions:

  • "Great API-based CMS with real-time features."

PocketBase

• Pros: Lightweight, self-hostable, integrates database and authentication.

• Cons: Less feature-rich compared to full-fledged CMSs.

• User Opinions:

  • "Great for small projects needing a simple backend."

Cockpit

• Pros: Lightweight, PHP-based, flexible.

• Cons: Less modern than other options.

Wix Studio

• Pros: No-code platform with advanced design tools, built-in hosting.

• Cons: Limited customization compared to fully headless solutions.

• User Opinions:

  • "Great for designers needing a quick setup."

Database-Driven CMSs

These CMSs store content in a database instead of Git.

Directus

• Pros: Fully customizable, Vue-based, self-hostable, supports complex workflows.

• Cons: More complex than Git-based CMSs.

• User Opinions:

  • "Perfect for projects that need more than a CMS."

Payload CMS

• Pros: TypeScript-based, developer-friendly, highly extendable.

• Cons: Requires significant setup, React-based.

• User Opinions:

  • "Powerful but too much setup for smaller projects."

WordPress (as Headless CMS)

• Pros: Established, well-documented API.

• Cons: Not built for Astro natively.

• User Opinions:

  • "A quick backend solution but not the most intuitive."

Drupal

• Pros: Highly customizable, enterprise-grade security, strong community support.

• Cons: Steeper learning curve, requires maintenance.

• User Opinions:

  • "Powerful but has a learning curve."

Keystone

• Pros: Database-driven (Postgres/MongoDB), customizable UI, flexible layout system.

• Cons: Requires setup and hosting.

StudioCMS

• Pros: Tight integration with Astro, combines static and dynamic content options.

• Cons: Still in development.

• User Opinions:

  • "Excited to see how this develops!"

Final Thoughts

Choosing the right CMS depends on your project’s needs:

• For Non-Technical Clients: DecapCMS, Sanity, and Keystatic.

• For Devs Wanting Control: Payload, Directus, or a custom-built solution.

• For Self-Hosting: Keystatic, Directus, Kirby, PocketBase.

• For Git-Based Workflow: DecapCMS, TinaCMS, Keystatic, GitCMS.

• For API-Based Flexibility: Sanity, Directus, Payload, Squidex.

• For DB-Backed: Keystone, Drupal, StudioCMS.

What’s your preferred CMS for Astro? Have you had any positive or negative experiences with the ones listed above? Share your thoughts below!